Follow EmergingSpaces on Twitter

Insight, news and opinions from Starcom MediaVest Group London.

Subscribe by RSS or by Email,
and follow us on Twitter.

Waitrose followers most likely to interact on Facebook

Steve Smith's picture

Our view at SMG is that one of the most important measures of success for a brand on Facebook draws from the actual number of interactions by people against its content, rather than just ‘likes’.

This week, I have looked at the total number of comments each supermarket has received against all its posts over the last seven days, and compared this total with how many ‘likes’ the supermarket has.

The results are very revealing. For every one hundred followers Waitrose has, it received 1.82 comments against all of the supermarket's posts this week. This is nearly three times the number of comments ASDA got, in second place. The question for other supermarkets is what is Waitrose doing from which they can learn?

Comments per 100 followers made against Facebook posts between 17-23 August

EngagementScore20120824.Png

The Twitterlympics

Scott Thompson's picture

Along with much of the country – if not the world – we have been watching the London 2012 Olympics with one eye on the TV and the other on Twitter, watching the reactions in what has been called the first "Social Media Olympics."

But as well as watching what's going on in our own timelines, in the SMG London Research team we've also been using our own ECHOscreen analysis tool to track the wider mentions and conversations about the Games.

We have been sharing a few of our findings with The Wall, Brand Republic and Ad Week – this is a selection of some of the most interesting things we have seen over the course of the Games so far.

This is a snippet- read the full post.

Effectiveness of Facebook at Driving Emotional Engagement

Steve Smith's picture

SMG Research, London, recently undertook a study with Facebook users to understand the effectiveness of brands’ content on Facebook at driving emotional engagement.

Supermarkets was one of the seven brand categories we investigated. First off, we looked at the proportions of visitors to each of five supermarket Facebook brand pages who reported experiencing positive emotions whilst viewing their content.

Visitors to Supermarket C were most likely to experience positive emotions whilst viewing content; visitors to Supermarket B were least likely.

supermarketemotion01.png

Two questions are, what value do emotional engagements have in terms of the purchase funnel and advocacy?, and do emotional engagements have more value than cognitive engagements, impacts on senses and driving curiosity?

Looking at Supermarket C, we can see that people who reported being impacted emotionally were most likely to prefer the supermarket over its competitors (66% of people who reported being impacted emotionally). People who were impacted through their visual senses were most likely to talk about the supermarket, and people who reported being emotionally engaged were only slightly less likely.

supermarketemotion02.png

Of course, some visitors who already prefer Supermarket C over its competitors will already be predisposed to be emotionally engaged with its content. Nevertheless, it is still highly probably that emotional engagement has some impact upon purchase funnel decisions and advocacy actions. Recommendations from the study include:

  • Design content to impact people emotionally and visually
  • Understand what types of emotions are likely to engage your visitors
  • Use emotional engagement as a measure of Facebook value in terms of purchase funnel, advocacy, repeat engagements, and brand equity

This originally appeared on MediaTel on 25 May

Themes from an IP&TV World Forum Panel

Steve Smith's picture

I took part in a panel at the IP&TV World Forum last week. These are three things we discussed...

Tesco's new jobs: What Twitterers think

Steve Smith's picture

This is a copy of an article I have written for MediaTel, published on its site today.

Tesco announced on Monday it is going to create 20,000 jobs over the next two years, and invite existing staff to do apprenticeship placements as part of their current roles.

This is the first attempt by Richard Brasher, Tesco UK CEO, to revitalise the supermarket following its first profit warning in twenty years, and it is coupled with plans for the supermarket to redesign some of the stores in view of declining shopper satisfaction with the shopping experience.

Research we have conducted shows just how much this is needed. As I reported back in December, a gap has been growing between people’s experiences of the supermarket and their desires for a more pleasurable shopping environment and for more enjoyable communications from the brand.

Another topic we picked up is around the importance that Tesco shoppers give to community. Creating 20,000 new jobs is a statement of commitment to local communities. More than a million 16-24 year olds are unemployed, and Tesco has stressed that some of the new jobs would include apprenticeship placements to young unemployed people.

To get a view of what people think about Tesco’s job creation, I had a look at a selection of Twitter Tweets about this news from over the last five days.

The first thing I learned was about what not to tweet. Nearly all of them merely related the news. Given that most people will have already heard about this announcement, these Tweets didn’t add anything new. My guess is that tweets that included a short opinion were much more likely to be interesting to readers.

The most common theme was the opinion was that the news is a smokescreen for recent bad publicity over the Government's work placement scheme. The timing might look slightly suspicious, but this is disingenuous. Talk has been around for a couple of months that Tesco had plans to revive its stores and customer service, and this is good news for old, and hopefully new, Tesco shoppers, as well as for the unemployed.

The second most common theme was the question of how many of these are new jobs? In an interview with Sky News, Richard Brasher stressed that this figure is a net figure and does not include people moving around the business. They are a also a mix of full time and part time posts. This is good news for government in its pursuit of getting lone mums into the workplace, for whom full time jobs are not always suitable. However it is less good news for a job market in which people are predominantly looking for full time jobs.

The third theme, although much smaller, was around how much should Tesco’s investors be concerned? Providing better customer experiences through redesigning interiors and creating all these new jobs will be expensive, and is likely to wipe out profit growth this year. However, Tesco’s moves are strategic. By providing better in-store experiences, the supermarket hopes to keep its existing customers and bring in new, loyal, customers. This means more money moving through the tills and therefore profit growth.

One thing I find interesting about this last theme is just how much investors have become accustomed to short termism. We used to look froward to annual reports. Now we look forward to quarterly reports and minute by minute share movements. It is interesting that following the announcement, the Tesco share price dropped 2%. The good news investors should be taking however is that the supermarket is making important decisions that are likely to impact customer satisfaction, bring in new customers, create loyalty and therefore create future profit growth.

From 'show and sell' to 'involve and tell'

Steve Smith's picture

This is a version of an article I recently wrote for MediaTel

Connecting with people used to be a case of, 'Here is a product; here is some advertising. We hope you enjoy them'.

Today, brand owners increasingly understand they need to connect with people in order to enter into a dialogue with them, which can then be extended to friends and family. One way of achieving this is through the creation of meaningful experiences in social media, which people are then likely to share.

Nike is a brand that understands the power of establishing connections, which are then likely to multiply across people's networks. In 2010 alone, Nike spent nearly US$800 million on 'non-traditional' advertising. Before social media, the biggest audience Nike could achieve was during the Super Bowl, when it could reach 200 million people. Yet today, it reaches this number any day across all its sites and social media.

Yet until now it has been unclear to brand owners just how many people invite others into conversations through the experiences they have on brands' social media. Of course, once someone comments on a brand page, some of their Facebook friends will receive a message. Nevertheless, not everyone will read this update, and in any case, research consistently shows that face to face talk and recommendations about a brand, reinforced with meaningful content, are likely to have greater impacts.

Using our Social Media Behaviour Index application, we looked at the likelihood of people who post positive comments on the Facebook pages of different UK supermarkets to then recommend those pages to other people. An interesting set of findings emerged that should inform the kinds of experiences that supermarkets provide to their visitors.

Brands_FB_page.gif

People who are likely to post a positive comment on Waitrose's Facebook page are most likely to introduce other people to the conversation (i.e. recommend the page). For every one hundred people who are likely to post a positive comment, 88 of them are likely to recommend the page to at least one other person.

At the other end of the spectrum only 62 out of every 100 people who are likely to post a positive comment on Sainsbury's Facebook page are then likely to introduce other people to recommend the page.

The implication here for Sainsbury's is this. Although the experiences it provides on Facebook are successful at inviting people into a conversation with it, the supermarket needs to do more to create experiences for people that are relevant to their friends and families. If it does this, these people are then likely to share those experiences. The following are five things Sainsbury's should consider:

  • Provide inspirational, entertaining and simple cooking videos. Waitrose does this, which is one reason its social media did so well at Christmas. Waitrose even has the caption against its videos, 'Share our love of food'
  • Provide recipes, which people can also give away. Both Waitrose and Tesco do this. Tesco even invites people to upload and share their own recipes, and so share in the conversation
  • Create competitions through which fans can include Facebook friends. For example, 'win a week's shopping for you and five of your Facebook friends'. To be included, these friends have to 'like' the supermarket.
  • Provide vouchers that Facebook fans can give away. Better still, give additional reductions if they can show they have shared money off vouchers with friends on Facebook. For example, 'Double your discount if you share with ten of your Facebook friends'
  • Give Facebook fans fuel vouchers to share with friends and family. Many are likely to visit the store to do a shop at the same time they fill their tanks

Pinterest: Examining the User Experience

So, Pinterest. Heard of it? Probably. Using it? Well if you’re reading this from the UK, it’s unlikely you’ve done much more than had a quick browse, or maybe repined the odd thing. However if you’re reading this from over the other side of the Atlantic, you’re likely to be one of many who’ve contributed to their 4000% growth over the past year – especially if you’re a woman.

But what exactly is it about the site that’s caused this level of growth and excitement?

Firstly, What is it?

Getting fed up with numerous files and folders Evan Sharp formed Pinterest, in order to “create a place where you can go to upload or collect things on the web and simply organize it the way you want”.

At its simplest level, users can “pin”, and aggregate individual pieces of content to a “board”. Pins on other users’ boards can be “repinned” (placed) to one of yours, or you can “like” or comment on the pin.

To find content, you can select a topic, see what’s “popular”, or search by keyword. Alternatively you can look for potential gifts by selecting a price range to browse.

Why it’s good

Pinterest appears to provide users with a more sharable and varied means of personal amplification than other social networks, whilst building in graded degrees of personal gratification (that “feel good” factor) at all levels of the user journey.

Straight from the get-go, standard and video searches immediately result in content for users to engage with. As the person builds their profile by pinning, repining, liking, commenting and following, each action has the potential for a reciprocal action, most of which amplify the user’s presence on Pinterest and increase the user’s enjoyment of the site.

Similarly to Twitter, it’s this constant creation, sharing and enjoyment of “pull” content that has played heavily in it’s growth, every action spreading in a Google+esque Ripple. I.e. Only one person has to upload content for numerous people to consequently find and share it, with each link feeling positive that their content was deemed interesting/funny enough to interact with.

It is suggested that this is happening, not just because that’s how you interact with the site, but because users have the confidence to do so. What’s meant by this is that with 80% of pins currently being repinns, users generally aren’t accountable for the content pinned on their board. This removes the fear of anything more than superficial judgment from an action - i.e. Sarah will be less bothered about people disliking the picture of some pretty flowerpots that she repined, than if she knows the photo album she created will be pushed out on all her friends’ Facebook walls or on their Twitter feeds – a worry that’s beautifully displayed by the Facebook post-night-out-detagging ritual.

This is reinforced by the fact that (as previously said) the pin/repinn isn’t pushed onto anyone. Conversely to Facebook, it’s the content that creates the profile/person, not the other way around. This, alongside the fact that consumers are given choice and selectivity over the content they view - in a way other social networks don’t - is another huge factor in Pinterest’s rise to fame.

Everyone has different interests, and most importantly, different interests that they share with different people. Allowing people to follow singular boards of others enables a Circles - type effect and lets consumers segment their interests, and ensure they see content that’s relevant to them on an individual level.

Whilst the potential for “going viral” is somewhat hampered at the moment by the majoritatively tame subject matter, that the relevant content is organically growing creates the potential for more niche, semi-viral incidences. E.g. A Fantastic pic of a new Thompson holiday destination that a celeb went to, whilst unlikely to go viral in its traditional sense, could well get wide and fast reach through people interested in holidays, celebs, or nice landscapes.

Conclusion

Whilst at the moment, the 200,000 uniques in the UK are dwarfed by the 12,000,000 in the US, Pinterest’s engaging, relevant and gratifying user experience and organic growth is likely to ensure an impact over here.

Whilst who’s currently using Pinterest and the way they’re using it here in the UK is vastly different to in the States, that’s a topic for another time. But rest assured, if you don’t currently have a Pinterest account, you should, as otherwise you could become uncool very, very soon.

Follow Owen at @Oven121 on Twitter

Target tablet owners to drive discovery

Steve Smith's picture

The IAB (Internet Advertising Bureau) recently conducted research tracing the roles smartphone owners give to their mobiles, tablets and laptops in the purchase journey.

Findings about tablet owners from the 800 strong study have important implications for retailers. IAB found that people who own a smartphone and tablet are more than twice as likely than ‘smartphone only’ owners to discover new products they would not otherwise have considered (20% vs 8%).

The reason for this is that tablet owners spend an average of 4.4 hours shopping online each week on their tablets. This compares with 2.2 hours on smartphones and 2.9 hours on laptops or PCs. Having larger screens and more powerful capabilities than smartphones, they are still small enough for people to carry round the home and even outside. At the same time, people tend to prefer them over laptops for online browsing and shopping activities because they are smaller, lighter, much faster at powering up, and provide a better user experience through applications and touchscreens.

One retailer that has taken advantage of the capabilities of the iPad is the furniture retailer, Harveys. In partnership with MediaVest, it has developed a tablet application (also available on the iPhone) through which people are able to browse the Harveys furniture range and superimpose different products onto images they capture by the device. People can then flip the image and try out different colour schemes. The app also has a social element through which people can share photos and get their comments. It mirrors the retailer’s strategic shift towards a more aspirational brand rather than one driven by price and sales messaging.

Initiatives such as this enable retailers to get closer to people by helping them meet their desires, aspirations and needs. Whether people want to create their ideal home, ideal wardrobe or ideal holiday, retailers that can facilitate them in this journey are more likely to win their attention and help them through to research, enquiry and purchase.